Saturday, April 23, 2011

Tricks of the Restaurant Trade: 7 Ways Menus Make You Spend

I am totally proud. My younger son Ezra recently graduated from the CIA. Not the government spy agency but the Culinary Institute of America. Based in Hyde Park, N.Y., it trains chefs and restaurant managers, and according to its website, is "recognized as the world's premier culinary college with an industry-wide reputation for excellence." I hope so, because, over the years, we paid a lot of tuition.
Ezra's education, however, included mastering some skills almost as surreptitious as those employed by a secret agent. Example: Menu engineering, the topic of his honors thesis.
"The menu is the heart of the restaurant. It embodies the restaurant's demographics, concept, physical factors and personality," Ezra wrote in solid prose that is an obvious genetic inheritance from his mother. But don't kid yourself. A menu, he confided to me in an exclusive interview, is also a sales vehicle, and many restaurants -- smart ones -- use it to get you to eat right. And, we're not talking about your health, but about their profits.
Restaurant dishes generally divide up four groups, says Ez. First come stars -- popular items for which diners are willing to pay much more than the dishes cost to make. Example: penne with vodka sauce. Plowhorses, are popular but less profitable items, like steak. Puzzlers are high-profit items that are tough to sell, say, sweetbreads. Finally, there are dogs that not many people like and aren't profitable. Why they are on anybody's menu, I'm not sure. Clever menu engineering exists to steer you to stars and puzzlers, to spend as much as possible and to enjoy doing it. After all, restaurateurs want repeat business.
There's nothing wrong with any of that. Nevertheless, before you order your next Lasagna Classico at Olive Garden, Crunchy Rabbit at Jean Georges in Manhattan or Egg McMuffin at You-Know-Where, you might want to be aware of these seven common menu ploys.
1. First in show. Many restaurants group their offerings under the obvious headings: pasta, beef, seafood, entrees, appetizers and so on. Testing has shown that if you decide on chicken, you are more likely to order the first item on the chicken list. That's where a savvy restaurant will place its most profitable chicken dish. A really sharp chef might put a puzzler like sweetbreads first in a grouping. "They only cost about $3, so the margin is huge," says Ez. Of course, you've got to hope that enough people like sweetbreads.
2. Menu Siberia. Unprofitable dishes, like a seafood combo plate that require expensive ingredients, and lots of work, are usually banished to a corner that's less noticeable or in a multi-page menu stashed on page five.
3. Visual aids. If you draw a line around it, people will order. That's why many menus box off something they want to promote. Chicken wings are a prime example. They're "garbage," says my son of one of my favorite noshes. "They cost pennies so they're huge profit items." Photos also sell dishes. An album of what look like ten-inch-high pies set on each table at Bakers Square make it hard to resist ordering a slice. Fancy-schmancy restaurants, however, like this one in Westport, Conn., consider photos déclassé; from them the most you'll get is a sketch or two.
4. Package deals. So you stop by McDonald's for a mid-afternoon burger. When you get to the counter, however, what's really in your face are photos of Extra Value Meals. You figure, says Ez, "Hey, I could eat two patties, I could use some fries, and now I'll get a soft drink too." The single burger you intended to buy is off in menu Siberia, on the board far to the right, but you've already spent more than you intended. A small percentage of the chain's 47 million customers dropping a few extra bucks each day translates to millions in additional revenue. Another example: Olive Garden's Bottomless Pasta Bowl ($8.95). "It's very unlikely you're going to eat more than two bowls," says Ez. And, as one whiny diner noted, you're like to scarf so many free breadsticks first that you won't have room for all those noodles.
5. Dollar-sign avoidance. Focus groups who've been asked to opine on menus display an acute discomfort with dollar signs and decimals. Keeping money as abstract as possible makes spending less threatening. Many high-tone foodie establishments that charge an arm and a leg for, say, a bowl of lentils and groats now omit such crass symbols from their menus -- like Spoonriver, a place I like in Minneapolis. I almost don't notice that I've paid $12.50 for a rather small chicken quesadilla. Once upon a time, menus used leader dots (... .) to connect the entree with the price. You won't find them much anymore either.
6. The small plate-large plate conundrum. A restaurant may offer two chicken Caesar salads, one for $9 and one for $12. You may think that you're getting a break ordering the small one, but, says Ez, that's really the size they want to sell. And if a diner decides, hmmm, I may as well get the larger one because I'll never get rich saving three bucks, the restaurant will throw on some extra lettuce, making the price differential almost pure profit.
7. Ingredient embroidery. Foodie-centric restaurants practically list the recipe for each dish making each ingredient sound ultra-special. (An item is more likely to sell if it dwells on the fact that, say, the cheese came from cows at the Brunschwagergrunt Farm in western Wisconsin or that the organic mushrooms were raised by a former duchess with an advanced degree in microbiology.) Even at a humble eatery, however, a dish labeled Mom's Special Mac and Cheese or "The BeeBop Bar's Mac and Four Cheese casserole" sells better than just plain old mac and cheese. "It may not be any more special than what you get somewhere else, but you'll start to think you can only get it there," says Ez. And that will keep you coming back again and again.
You won't find these gambits at every eatery. Not all restaurant owners plan their menus as carefully as they should. If they did, contends my kid, maybe they would stop placing entrées in the middle of the right hand page, prime menu real estate, because "most people who go to a restaurant are going to order an entrée anyway." he says. "That's where I'd put desserts."
This article is part of a series related to being Financially Fit

Friday, April 15, 2011

A BlackBerry Tablet, but Where Are the Apps?


nytimes

Related Quotes

SymbolPriceChange
RIMM53.920.00
Chart for Research In Motion Limited
{"s" : "rimm","k" : "a00,a50,b00,b60,c10,g00,h00,l10,p20,t10,v00","o" : "","j" : ""}
, On Wednesday April 13, 2011, 9:00 pm EDT
Listen, I’ll be straight with you. I realize that tablets are crazy hot right now, that 2011 is the Year of the iPad Clone and that every company and its brother is rushing one to market. But I’m sorry. I’m not going to review every one of the 85 tablets that will arrive this year; it’s only April, and I’ve already got Tablet Fatigue. I’m not going to review the Electrolux tablet, the Polaroid tablet, the Sunoco tablet, the Kellogg’s tablet. ...
The BlackBerry tablet, though, seems worth a look. The tech world’s been hyperventilating over this thing. It’s called the PlayBook, and it’s a seven-inch touch-screen tablet ($500, $600, and $700 for the 16-, 32- and 64-gigabyte models).
The iPad, of course, is a 10-incher, but seven has its virtues. It’s much easier to hold with one hand, for example. In principle, you ought to be able to slip the PlayBook into the breast pocket of a jacket — but incredibly, the PlayBook is about half an inch too wide. Whoever muffed that design spec should be barred from the launch party.
Still, the PlayBook looks and feels great: hard rubberized back, brilliant, super-responsive multitouch screen, solid heft (0.9 pounds).
Its software is based on an operating system called QNX, which Research In Motion, the BlackBerry’s maker, bought for its industrial stability. (“It runs nuclear power plants,” says a product manager without a trace of current-events irony.)
Nor is QNX the only other company that lent a hand. Palm and Apple were also involved, although they didn’t know it. The PlayBook software is crawling with borrowed ideas.
For example, to remove or rearrange apps, you hold your finger down on one app icon until all icons begin to pulse (hello, iPad!). And to close a program, you swipe your finger upward from the bottom bezel to turn all app windows into “cards,” and then flick one upward off the screen (hello, Palm Pre!).
There are no buttons on the front at all, and the top edge has only On, Play/Pause and volume keys. Instead, you navigate by swiping your finger from the black border, which seems unduly wide, into the screen itself.
Swiping upward reveals your app icons (and turns your apps into “cards”). Swiping left or right cycles among open multitasking apps. And swiping down reveals an app’s toolbar, if it has one.
Unfortunately, there’s no way of knowing beforehand if a toolbar exists, so you often swipe futilely and feel silly. Similarly, if app icons completely fill the home screen, you can swipe upward to reveal more — but you won’t know if there are more until you swipe, because no scrollbar appears beforehand to let you know there’s more below the screen.
But the PlayBook does three impressive things that its rivals — the iPad and the Android tablets — can only dream about.
First, with a special HDMI cable (not included), you can hook it up to a TV or projector, which is great for PowerPoint presentations. (Apparently they still do those in corporations.)
The iPad does that, but the TV image is identical to the iPad’s screen image. The PlayBook, however, can show two different things. On the TV, the audience sees your slides; on the PlayBook, you get to see the traditional PowerPoint cheat sheet of notes and slide thumbnails.
The second cool feature has to do with loading the tablet with your music, photos and music. Unfortunately, there’s no iTunes-like software to do this automatically. You have to drag files manually from your computer into the PlayBook’s folders (Music, Photos and so on). But once you’ve set up this process using a USB cable, you can do it thereafter over Wi-Fi — wirelessly. The PlayBook can even accept such wireless transfers when it’s in sleep mode, sitting in your purse or briefcase across the room.
Finally, there’s a wild, wireless Bluetooth connection feature called BlackBerry Bridge. In this setup, the PlayBook acts as a giant viewing window onto the contents of a BlackBerry phone. Whatever e-mail, calendar, address book and instant messages are on the BlackBerry now show up on the PlayBook’s much roomier screen — a live, encrypted two-way link.
(Another advantage of pairing the PlayBook with a BlackBerry: The tablet can get online using the BlackBerry’s cellular connection. You don’t have to pay another $15 or $20 a month for a tethering plan, as you do with iPhones and Android phones.)
BlackBerry Bridge is supposed to appeal to the corporate network administrators who are R.I.M.’s bread and butter, because they can deploy PlayBooks without having to worry about security breaches. Everything they’ve worked so hard to secure on your BlackBerry — e-mail, calendar and so on — stays there. It only appears to be on the PlayBook.
But — are you sitting down? — at the moment, BlackBerry Bridge is the only way to do e-mail, calendar, address book and BlackBerry Messenger on the PlayBook. The PlayBook does not have e-mail, calendar or address book apps of its own. You read that right. R.I.M. has just shipped a BlackBerry product that cannot do e-mail. It must be skating season in hell. (R.I.M. says that those missing apps will come this summer.)
What you do get are built-in versions of Documents to Go, for creating and editing Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents. And you get a nice Web browser that plays Flash videos online, which the iPad still can’t do. The PlayBook’s front and back cameras (3 and 5 megapixels) can record stabilized stills and high-definition video.
Unfortunately, there’s no video chatting app, as with Android tablets and the iPad. Similarly, the tablet has GPS, but without turn-by-turn navigation software, it’s not good for much other than the built-in Bing Maps app.
And that’s just the beginning. For now, the PlayBook’s motto might be, “There’s no app for that.”
No existing apps run on this all-new operating system, not even BlackBerry phone apps. (R.I.M. says an emulator that will run BlackBerry apps will come later this year.)
So the company has decided to start from scratch with an all-new app store for the PlayBook. The company says that it has 3,000 submissions already, in part because it offered a free PlayBook to anyone who’d write an app. But they won’t be revealed until next week. (Reviewers were shown only a skeletal store with a few dozen lame apps in it.)
You should also be aware that this PlayBook is Wi-Fi only. You don’t have the option to get online via a cellular network, as you can with the rivals from Apple, Motorola and Samsung. (R.I.M. says that 4G versions of the PlayBook will arrive by the end of 2011.)
The PlayBook, then, is convenient, fast and coherently designed. But in its current half-baked form, it seems almost silly to try to assess it, let alone buy it.
Remember, the primary competition is an iPad — the same price, but much thinner, much bigger screen and a library of 300,000 apps. In that light, does it make sense to buy a fledgling tablet with no built-in e-mail or calendar, no cellular connection, no videochat, Skype, no Notes app, no GPS app, no videochat, no Pandora radio and no Angry Birds?
You should also know that even now, only days before the PlayBook goes on sale April 19, the software is buggy and still undergoing feverish daily revision. And the all-important BlackBerry Bridge feature is still in beta testing. It’s missing important features, like the ability to view e-mail file attachments or click a link in an e-mail.
If all of this gets fixed, the apps arrive, and the PlayBook can survive this year’s onslaught of rival tablets, then it may one day wind up in the pantheon of greats. For now, there are too many features that live only in R.I.M.’s playbook — and not enough in its PlayBook.
E-mail: pogue@nytimes.com

Thursday, April 14, 2011

5 Ways to Torpedo Your Retirement

by Neal Frankle
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
provided by
USNews_logo.jpg
Couples who work hard all their lives often eagerly look forward to retirement. But working for 30 or more years doesn't guarantee that you will be able to retire comfortably. Here are five common retirement planning errors that generally torpedo your ability to retire.
More from USNews.com:

How to Save for Retirement on a Low Income

10 Places to Go Carless in Retirement

Find Your Best Place to Retire
1. Too much debt. Having debt is not the kiss of death for your retirement. But high interest debt such as credit card debt could be, especially if you can't figure out how to get out of debt and begin saving for the future. It's extremely difficult to invest for retirement when you are still paying off past purchases.
2. Spend your retirement savings on college. Some couples make it a financial priority to pay for their children's college so that they will not begin their careers with debt. However, when you tap your home equity, stop saving for retirement, or even raid your retirement accounts to pay for your children's college, you may be sacrificing your own retirement security. On top of that, you will be missing a golden opportunity to teach your kids about money. There are a variety of ways to finance college, but you can't take out loans for retirement.
3. No emergency plan. Most of us are completely dependent on the money we receive from a single job. Losing that job can easily exhaust your savings and jeopardize your entire financial plan. It's important to develop an emergency fund and plan before you hit those stormy waters. Consider taking on a second job or developing a side business to diversify your income streams in case a layoff should occur.
4. No long-term investment strategy. Some people change their investment allocation based on the latest financial news. This can be a huge mistake. If you pulled money out of equities when the market tumbled in 2008, you also didn't take advantage of the market recovery that has since occurred. Retirement savers need to accept that there will be fluctuations in mutual fund performance and invest for the long term. The only way to combat this type of emotional investing is to have a well thought out investment plan for retirement income that balances financial needs with emotional demands. Then you need to stick with that investment plan throughout financial storms.
[Changes That Will Improve Your Odds of Retiring]
5. No retirement plan. The most dangerous mistake individuals can make is having no retirement plan. Financial plans are not set in stone and you won't be able to foresee every contingency. But having an approximate roadmap you can follow is better than having no plan.
You can be smart, responsible, and hard-working and still end up without enough resources for a secure retirement. In order to make sure this doesn't happen to you, take the time to put together a plan, track your spending, and don't get into debt if you can help it. Think through your investment strategy and stick to it even when you feel tempted to change it.
Neal Frankle is a certified financial planner and runs Wealth Pilgrim, a personal finance blog that helps people make smart decisions about their money. As a start, he suggests that you strive to understand your credit score range.
___

Popular Stories on Yahoo!:

Bargain Retirement Spots

Most Peaceful States in the U.S.

Ghost Towns of the 21st Century

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Car Brands With the Worst Reputations For Quality

print
By Marty Padgett
Quality means different things to different car buyers—everything from reliability to fuel efficiency to utility. It's nebulous, but it can make or break the launch of a new vehicle or the success of a car company, affecting everything from positive press to negative word-of-mouth reviews.

Some brands still rise to the top of the charts when shoppers get asked about the quality of different automakers' new vehicles—and some brands sink to the bottom based on those factors.


ALG, an automotive data company specializing in setting residual values for leased vehicles, sets out twice a year to see which brands fare better in the minds of consumers, and which fare worse. Polling between 3000 and 4000 consumers, the company comes up with ALG Perceived Quality Score, which rates auto brands on the "emotional connection" buyers have to the brands, based on a possible score of 100.

The most recent survey gives many automakers a reason to cheer: Toyota and Lexus, despite their recent strings of recalls, still sit at or near the top of the quality charts. As ALG points out, bad press can take years to detach itself from an automaker's reputation, but Toyota seems to have made it through charges of unintended acceleration without much damage. Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Honda and Ford continue to fare very well, as well.

For other automakers, the most recent survey isn't much good news. A trio of struggling brands is now tied up with the new cellar dweller for perceived quality, while two others fight visibility problems. One brand with a relatively poor showing is on the way up, though.

Which ones rank at the bottom? They start with the newest brand on the American car market:

Fiat

Italy's Fiat hasn't even been back on the U.S. market for long, but it's starting in the basement. As ALG points out, the brand will have to erase distant memories of terrible vehicles from the 1970s before it can convince legions of American buyers that the stylish, entertaining 2012 Fiat 500 subcompact is worth its $15,500 base price. Fiat earned the lowest score in the most recent PQS, at 37.5.

Suzuki

One of the few Japanese automakers to miss out on the sales boom of the last decade, Suzuki's thin brand presence and lack of distinctive vehicles probably has more to do with its low score of 46.8, since vehicles like the Kizashi sedan have been well-received.

Smart

Struggling Smart, with a score of 39.8, hasn't had a great 2011 thus far. Its U.S. dealers are being reabsorbed into Mercedes-Benz, and plans to sell a Nissan-based four-door have been cancelled. The very small Fortwo is selling slowly probably because its lack of utility and gas mileage that's lower than some larger, gas-engined cars. Is a fix in the works? Smart USA says yes, and points to electric Fortwos and other future products as its ticket out of the doldrums.

Dodge

The first of Chrysler's three brands in the survey, Dodge's score of 45.5 doesn't come as much of a surprise, since reliability ratings regularly fall behind those of the other domestics. Significant improvements to its best sellers—the 2011 Grand Caravan, 2011 Journey and the Avenger—could have a dramatic effect on its showing down the road, though.

Chrysler

The flagship brand of Chrysler is down to three vehicles, including the 2011 Chrysler 300. Save that classy sedan, it's the lack of new, differentiated products coupled to less than stellar reliability ratings that's landed Chrysler a score of 47.1 in the study.

Kia

Kia shows how quickly an automaker's reputation can shift. Its rating of 49.3 is on the rise, and the automaker's new vehicles—the 2011 Sorento, Soul, Sportage and Optima—consistently rank high in consumer surveys. The Sorento, in fact, recently earned the company's first Recommended pick from choosy Consumer Reports.

Jeep

With a clear brand image, Jeep doesn't have the marketing problems that Chrysler's other brands have—but the troubled reliability of its hallmark product, the Grand Cherokee, can't have helped it much in an overall score of 52.7.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Tax Excuses That the IRS Won't Buy


provided by
mainstreet.jpg
Americans have tried just about everything to get out of paying their taxes, the Internal Revenue Service says, but very few of these excuses are likely to work.
The IRS recently released its annual The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments report, which outlines not only the most popular arguments people have presented over the years to avoid paying their taxes, but also the policy statements and inevitable tax court decisions the government has used to debunk them.
"Anyone who contemplates arguing on legal grounds against paying their fair share of taxes should first read the 84-page document," the IRS said in a statement.
More from MainStreet.com

9 Unexpected Tax Deductions

What a Second Marriage Does to Your Money

The Hidden Costs of Bad Credit
Taxpayers' contentions have run the gamut over the years. Whether you're arguing that you don't have to pay your taxes based on moral grounds or because only "employees" of the government are subject to federal income tax, though, it's likely to cost you a significant amount of time and a decent sum of money.
Back in 2006, Congress increased the penalty for frivolous tax returns to $5,000 from $500. The penalty is applied when a person submits a tax return and any portion of the submission is based on a position the IRS identifies as frivolous. Filers typically present forms that indicate they have no income or tax liability, also known as a "zero return." Their reasons for not paying usually come up in tax court when the filers try to contest an audit or lien.
Those who were planning a dispute can find the full report on the agency's website, but MainStreet highlighted some of the main contentions disputed in federal courts and now considered frivolous by definition.
Contention: Taxpayers can refuse to pay income taxes on religious or moral grounds.
The IRS says taxpayers have frequently used the First Amendment to argue that they don't have to pay taxes because it is against their moral or religious beliefs, since it says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The Supreme Court has frequently asserted that saying your religious beliefs are in conflict with the payment of taxes provides no basis for refusing to pay, though.
Contention: Paying taxes violates the Fifth Amendment.
The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution says a person shall not be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This might sound like a sound argument if the law hadn't already decided it is well within the government's rights to charge residents to live here. According to the IRS, the Supreme Court stated in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R., 240 U.S. 1, 24 (1916), that "it is ... well settled that [the Fifth Amendment] is not a limitation upon the taxing power conferred upon Congress by the Constitution."
Contention: Taxes are a form of servitude in violation of the 13th Amendment.
Residents have argued that paying taxes is a form of servitude, which is problematic, since the 13th Amendment prohibits slavery (as well as the imposition of involuntary servitude). Courts have consistently found that paying taxes is not considered forced servitude, though, calling the claim "clearly unsubstantial and without merit," as well as "far-fetched and frivolous."
Keep in mind that the IRS does have payment plans available for taxpayers who find themselves significantly impaired financially. In fact, the IRS recently made changes to its lien system, the main way the agency penalizes people who can't pay their taxes on time.

Have you ever tried making an argument to the IRS against paying your taxes?

Have you ever tried making an argument to the IRS against paying your taxes?

  • Yes
    4%
  • I plan to.
    4%
Follow Yahoo! Finance on Twitter; become a fan on Facebook.

2,112 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    robert 23 seconds ago Report Abuse
    i would not mind paying tax's at all ..but the issue i have is i have worked at the same place for 18 years i bring home around 85 a year after tax's i have a wife and 3 kids ..but ppl all around me live for the most part better or the same who are on every gov plan you can think of ..welfare food stamps disibility and so on ...some of these ppl i am sure need help but i see a lot of them sucking the gov. tit ...and it just seems like if the ppl giving out all these checks should have to really get to the bottom of ...do they really need it or are they just lazy....thanks
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    david 39 seconds ago Report Abuse
    I once told the IRS that I made no income on my watermelon and fried chicken stand, because Tyrone ate all my watermelons and fried chicken one night.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Synopsisav 55 seconds ago Report Abuse
    Big D wrote: Last year I had an emergency and I took out a loan on my retirement as a last resort. Can someone please explain why I should have to pay taxes on my own money when I've already paid most of it back?

    In general, you don't have to pay taxes on a loan. However, since there is no obligation to pay back a retirement loan, it is not a true loan in the sense of the word. And since money placed there was allowed to be deposited and grow tax free, that is why you have to pay it back. However, if you take a standard loan, including against your life insurance policy, an after tax annuity, or a CD, you generally do not pay taxes.

    Note, I am not a tax professional, just stuff I remember.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Dwight Watts 1 minute ago Report Abuse
    SENSORSHIP!!!! GO FIGURE
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Thomas 1 minute ago Report Abuse
    It was the Spanish that actually came here before the white settlers; the Spanish came for gold and destroyed the Mayans and the Incans! Wise up Shahska!
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Archangel 1 minute ago Report Abuse
    Taxes are too paid by folks who worked for the federal Government
    The only taxes that can be taken from you is "Income" Income is money earn from capital gains off the stock Market, The IRS which is a Franchise like McDonalds, knows tham well that they can not tax your Pecuniary wages, Pecuniary wages are wages earn from Jobbing, not working, for work man ship, is exactly what the word means, Man or woman work on your ship, the ship is the vessel called the body, your soul is the pilot if you have one, Taxes, Insurance, bills are all a lie to Keep the society from achieving their last step towards their evolution, and worst then these is the @#$%, called the drivers license, which is an excise tax and has nothing to due with your god, or higher spirit given right to travel to and from on this earth, The IRS is not mandatory, and whoever tells they are tell them to show you where Wake up America.... The only money is silver moons, and golden suns, gold and silver, if you think, if many of you still due that study the constitution, and not the @#$% corporate policies, and by law and codes, that the corporations of what is know called states have implemented, its not a black, white, purple, or green thing, its a humin thing, due your research i dare Ya.. The Rabbit hole is deep....
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Dont Be Dense 1 minute ago Report Abuse
    Well it looks like theres a new gas tax about to hit us soon..F'in theives..

Sunday, April 3, 2011

The Best MPG Vehicles In Every Class


Saving on gas doesn't require going small anymore.
print
By Joann Muller
It looks like this summer could be a repeat of 2008, when the price of regular gasoline spiked to $4.11 in July and panicked drivers rushed to trade in their big, thirsty SUVs for gas-sipping compact cars. When prices subsided by autumn, however, buyer's remorse set in for many consumers who wondered, "What was I thinking?"

If gas prices keep rising this time around, anyone who wants to go small has a more appealing range of cars to choose from, including the redesigned Hyundai Elantra and Ford Focus, and the new Chevrolet Cruze.

But consumers don't have to condemn themselves to cramming into a tiny four-seater to save on gas. Aside from electric cars (which have special characteristics), there are now plenty of fuel-efficient choices in virtually every vehicle category, from luxury sedans to minivans and pickup trucks.

The 42-mpg Lexus CT 200h, for instance, starting at $29,120, is the most efficient upscale sedan on the market, according to www.fueleconomy.gov, a U.S. Department of Energy website. Among wagons, the diesel-powered Audi A3 (starting at $30,250) and the Volkswagen Jetta TDI ($24,995) both get an average 34 mpg. Even the full-size, gasoline-powered Toyota Avalon ($32,595) delivers an impressive combination of performance and fuel economy from its V6 engine: 268 hp and 23 mpg. Meanwhile, more efficient crossover utility vehicles have largely replaced their hog-like SUV brethren.

"What eludes consumers is how rapidly the market is changing," said Philip Reed, senior consumer advice editor for automotive research site Edmunds.com. When gas prices spiked three years ago, he said, carmakers made a commitment to develop more fuel-efficient powertrains throughout their vehicle lineups. That includes not just more hybrids, but also smaller, turbo-charged gas engines, diesels and efficient six-speed transmissions.

"You don't have to buy a small car," said Reed, "and you don't have to buy a Prius either." The 50-mpg Toyota Prius hybrid naturally gets more consideration when gas prices are high. Indeed, it is still the most fuel-efficient family sedan on the market and the world's best-selling hybrid.

But the Prius may be harder to come by due to the March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan, where it is built. Toyota and other carmakers have been forced to suspend production because of parts shortages and rolling blackouts. As a result, prices are going up: In the first four days after the March 11 quake, the average price of a Prius rose $135, or 0.5%, to $25,629, according to Truecar.com.

To help consumers navigate the often-confusing data about fuel economy, the EPA recently changed the way its estimates mpg. Fuel economy labels now reflect the effects of faster speeds and acceleration, air conditioning systems and colder outside temperatures. And to make sure consumers aren't misled by the typically higher highway mileage numbers, the new labels include an average mpg (based on 55% city driving, 45% highway driving).

Reed's advice is not to trade in your car simply because you want better fuel economy. You'll pay about $2,000 in sales tax and license fees on a new $20,000 car—that's equivalent to half a year in gas money on your gas guzzler. "It's costly to change cars," he said. "Don't do it just because of gas prices."

If you're going to trade in your vehicle anyway, then by all means, look for one that gets good mileage, he said.

The Most Fuel-Efficient Cars In All Categories

Ford Escape hybrid

At 32 mpg, the Escape hybrid gets the best mileage of any SUV or crossover.


Toyota Avalon

A tad bland, perhaps, but this full-sized sedan's V6 delivers an impressive blend of power and efficiency at 23 mpg.


Audi A3 TDI

More expensive than the Volkswagen Jetta Sportswagen TDI, but both diesel-powered wagons get 34 mpg.


Chevrolet Silverado 1500 hybrid

At 21 mpg, GM's hybrid truck outshines all full-size pickups for fuel economy.


Lexus CT200h

This sporty new Lexus hybrid gets 42 mpg, best of any entry-level luxury sedan.



Click here to see the full list of The Most Fuel-Efficient Cars In All Categories


Facebook
Twitter